Does it make sense to use quarterly format for roadmaps? Do you do capacity planning for roadmap items that are more than 6 months out?

Yes, a quarterly cadence strikes the right balance between giving enough directional clarity and flexibility to adapt. Doing it on a rolling basis with decreasing resolut...

We rate our roadmaps and capacity plans by confidence level – so 6 months out is 70% confidence, beyond that is 50% or more. For choosing the right cadence, I think it ma...

We all inherently understand that the farther out you plan, the greater the uncertainty. This was also one of the key themes in the Agile development methodology. But I d...

It does—but with caveats.Quarterly roadmaps work well for near-term executionI use a quarterly format to create rhythm and alignment across product, engineering, and go-t...

This is highly dependent on your business and release management, but in my opinion, quarterly roadmaps work great for clarity and alignment—but don't treat them as gospe...

This would entirely depend on the stage of your product & the space you operate in.For example, if you are working on early stage 0->1 product, may be a monthly ro...

Using a quarterly roadmap format helps keep everyone aligned and focused on near-term goals, especially when sharing progress with stakeholders. It provides structure, he...

I very much prefer not to use quarterly formats for roadmaps; I am a huge fan of the now/next/later roadmap. If pressed, I will say "now" is 0-6 months, "next" is 6-12 mo...