Sharebird

What governance do you use to handle scope changes mid-cycle without stifling iteration?

Answer
6 Answers
  1. Liron Deutsch
    Liron Deutsch

    Product Management Leader • 7mo

    Changes in scope mid-cycle are common, and not always a bad thing. Sometimes they signal healthy learning, other times preventable misalignment. The key is knowing which is which and setting up governance that balances alignment with agility. First, prevent avoidable changes through my absolute mantra which is - continuous cross-craft collaboration. The most painful mid-cycle shifts I have seen came from teams not sharing enough context early and then being misaligned. As PMs, we need to constan ...Read More

    2,719 Views
  2. Ruchi Aggarwal
    Ruchi Aggarwal

    Former BILL Director, Product Management - Payments • 7mo

    I triage scope changes based on impact: does the new info affect MVP success, expose a missed requirement, or can it wait post-launch? If it’s critical, I evaluate timeline impact and what we can de-scope or shrink to absorb it. If not, it goes to backlog. Once decided, I communicate early and clearly on what changed, why, and the trade-offs. This keeps iteration fast without losing control

    960 Views
  3. Manjeet Singh
    Manjeet Singh

    Salesforce Senior Director of Product Management • 7mo

    In fast-moving AI product work, scope changes are normal. My governance balances speed and control so we can iterate without chaos. Here is my scope change formula Triage fast – classify (minor/major) and decide if it fits this cycle. Assess impact – check effect on time, cost, and key metrics. Re-prioritize – keep only what drives clear customer value. Timebox – run small experiments instead of full rebuilds. Communicate + trade off – clearly state what’s in, what’s out, and why. For example: " ...Read More

    794 Views
  4. Rosa Gonzalez Welton

    Intuit Director of Product Management • 7mo

    Embrace change as the constant, as part of the cycle of life in our product management practices. I know it can feel frustrating to shift from a well laid out plan but I would urge you to consider the “why” behind the change. It could turn out to be the best outcome for you and your product. Ask yourself: Do I have new information on customer needs and competitor actions Is there a sudden imperative to close acquisition or revenue gaps, for example if another initiative has fallen through Do I h ...Read More

    450 Views
  5. Becky Trevino
    Becky Trevino

    Flexera Chief Product Officer | Formerly Rackspace, Dell • 7mo

    Within a given quarter, we expect to deliver on at least 85% of what we have committed. This leaves open 15% for a mid-cycle change. If someone determines that work that was previously committed should be decommitted in favor of innovation they can reach out to a member of our Operations team to explain the change and the replacement. Given we've allocated 15%, we don't encourage complete overhauls of what we'd planned but we do leave space open for changes to occur.

    471 Views
  6. Shahid Hussain
    Shahid Hussain

    Google Group Product Manager, Android • 3mo

    In large orgs this happens all the time -- it's just part of the job. The first important this is to accept that it happens -- don't hang on to sunk cost. Secondly be really clear about what that scope change is. If you're getting it from a leadership discussion, be crystal clear on the change and rationale, because even if you're operating with a willingness to manage sunk cost, not everyone on the team may share your enlightened view. Third, have a good sense of what the scope change means for ...Read More

    741 Views

Related Ask Me Anything Sessions

Top Product Management Mentors